U.S. House · AL-02
Figures, Shomari
DAlabama 2nd38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 24, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 15 supporting and 6 opposing.
6
Opposing votes
15
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 32 mapped decisive vote(s): 26 supporting and 6 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
26 supporting · 6 opposingHIGH confidence
Shomari Figures' recorded votes on environmental regulation show a mixed pattern, with slightly more votes against expansion of environmental rules than for them.
28 supporting · 2 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 13 opposing.
12 supporting · 13 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 6 opposing.
14 supporting · 6 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 8 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
10 supporting · 8 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 7 supporting and 11 opposing.
7 supporting · 11 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Figures voted on 324 recorded measures with 58.6% attendance, missing 229 votes. Voting record shows strong alignment with party (94.8% party-line), with consistent opposition to spending, taxation, and social programs. Mapped votes indicate support for immigration, climate action, gun control, abortion rights, and LGBTQ+ rights. Conversely, record shows opposition across economic issues—tax policy, government spending, minimum wage, affordable housing—and social safety net programs including healthcare affordability, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Mixed or neutral positions on voting rights, criminal justice reform, workers' rights, and environmental protection.
Opposed tax increases, government spending, and social safety net expansions (16–36 opposing votes per issue)
Supported immigration reform, climate action, gun control, abortion rights, and LGBTQ+ protections (4–29 supporting votes)
Opposed defense spending, veterans affairs, and foreign aid (8–33 opposing votes)
Neutral stance on voting rights, criminal justice reform, and environmental protection (7–29 supporting, 7–23 opposing)
- 94.8% party-line voting; 58.6% attendance with 229 missed votes
Signature issues
- Immigration — Supported immigration reform (21 supporting vs. 5 opposing votes)HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Supported climate change action (29 supporting vs. 15 opposing votes)HIGH confidence
- Tax Policy — Opposed tax policy increases (8 supporting vs. 16 opposing votes)HIGH confidence
- Government Spending — Opposed government spending (20 supporting vs. 36 opposing votes)HIGH confidence
- LGBTQ+ Rights — Supported LGBTQ+ rights (5 supporting vs. 0 opposing votes)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 23, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.