U.S. House · AR-01

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 23 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 18 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 24 mapped decisive vote(s): 20 supporting and 4 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 15 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 4 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 16 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 2 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
Rep. Crawford voted with his party 100% of the time on recorded votes. He opposed immigration restrictions, climate action, and environmental protections based on 26, 47, and 51 mapped votes respectively. He supported defense spending and foreign aid (37 and 20 votes), and backed education affordability and energy cost measures (14 and 39 votes). He took neutral stances on workers' rights, minimum wage, and infrastructure. Attendance was 58.2%, with 231 votes missed.
Opposed immigration restrictions, climate action, and environmental protections (18, 31, 35 opposing votes respectively)
Supported defense spending, foreign aid, and education affordability (26, 16, 13 supporting votes)
Neutral on workers' rights, minimum wage, and infrastructure investment
100% party-line voting; 58.2% attendance with 231 missed votes
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 31 non-gated high-confidence issues · 6 moderate-confidence issues · 1 limited-evidence issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.