U.S. House · AR-03
Womack, Steve
RArkansas 3rd38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 20, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 27 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 15 opposing with 7 absence/present vote(s).
12 supporting · 15 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 27 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 14 opposing with 4 absence/present vote(s).
13 supporting · 14 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 24 mapped decisive vote(s): 19 supporting and 5 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
19 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 14 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
4 supporting · 14 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 14 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 4 opposing with 5 absence/present vote(s).
10 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 14 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 1 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
13 supporting · 1 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Womack voted with his party 99.3% of the time across 285 recorded votes, with a 51.5% attendance rate and 268 missed votes. His mapped record shows consistent opposition to climate change measures, immigration reform, gun control restrictions, and most social safety net expansions. He supported defense spending and foreign aid. On education, he backed both public education funding and education affordability. His votes on government spending, infrastructure, women's rights, and mental healthcare showed mixed patterns. Limited evidence exists on LGBTQ+ rights due to minimal mapped votes.
Opposed on
immigration (22 vs 4), climate change (25 vs 13), environmental protection (34 vs 9), criminal justice reform (23 vs 5)
Supported on
defense spending (25 vs 11), foreign aid (14 vs 7), education affordability (11 vs 4), energy costs (24 vs 13)
Mixed/neutral on
government spending (31 vs 24), infrastructure (7 vs 7), women's rights (6 vs 5), mental healthcare (4 vs 3)
99.3% party-line voting; 51.5% attendance with 268 missed votes
- Limited evidence on LGBTQ+ rights (1 mapped vote); limited evidence on abortion rights (2 mapped votes)
Signature issues
- Immigration — Opposed immigration reform: 22 opposing vs 4 supporting votesHIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Opposed climate change measures: 25 opposing vs 13 supporting votesHIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Opposed environmental protection: 34 opposing vs 9 supporting votesHIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Supported defense spending: 25 supporting vs 11 opposing votesHIGH confidence
- Education Affordability — Supported education affordability: 11 supporting vs 4 opposing votesHIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 36 non-gated high-confidence issues · 2 limited-evidence issues · 1 evidence-gated issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.