U.S. House · AZ-04
Stanton, Greg
DArizona 4th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 26, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 8 opposing.
8
Opposing votes
13
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 30 supporting and 4 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
30 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 30 mapped decisive vote(s): 29 supporting and 1 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
29 supporting · 1 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 24 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 14 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
10 supporting · 14 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 6 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
13 supporting · 6 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 8 opposing.
11 supporting · 8 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 7 supporting and 11 opposing.
7 supporting · 11 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Stanton voted with his party 92.5% of the time. On top-tier issues, he mapped as supporting climate change action and environmental protection, while opposing tax policy and government spending. He voted to support abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights, and criminal justice reform. On economic issues, his record shows opposition to minimum wage increases, Medicare, and Medicaid. Attendance was 58.2%, with 231 votes missed. Most stances rest on HIGH confidence from 5+ mapped votes; Social Security evidence is LIMITED.
92.5% party-line voting; 58.2% attendance (231 votes missed)
Supports climate action, environmental protection, abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights
Opposes tax policy, government spending, Medicare, Medicaid, minimum wage increases
Mixed or neutral record on immigration, gun control, workers' rights, infrastructure
- Most stances HIGH confidence from 5+ mapped votes; Social Security LIMITED evidence
Signature issues
- Climate Change — Supports climate change action (35 pro vs. 16 con votes)HIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Supports environmental protection (30 pro vs. 17 con votes)HIGH confidence
- Abortion Rights — Supports abortion rights (6 pro vs. 3 con votes)HIGH confidence
- Tax Policy — Opposes tax policy (5 pro vs. 14 con votes)HIGH confidence
- LGBTQ+ Rights — Supports LGBTQ+ rights (7 pro vs. 2 con votes)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 28, 2026 • 32 non-gated high-confidence issues · 2 moderate-confidence issues · 4 limited-evidence issues · 1 evidence-gated issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.