U.S. House · CA-01

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 16 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 15 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
15
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
17 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 9 supporting and 16 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
Related funding categories
Funding categories are reported separately from voting evidence and do not imply causation or influence.
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 14 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 17 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 5 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 16 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 12 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 15 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 4 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 13 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 2 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
Rep. LaMalfa voted with his party 100% of the time on recorded votes. He opposed immigration restrictions (21 of 24 mapped votes), environmental and climate measures (36 of 42 on environmental protection; 30 of 37 on climate), and most economic regulations. He supported defense spending (18 of 30 votes), energy cost measures (18 of 28 votes), and education-related proposals (7 of 9 on education affordability; 9 of 15 on public education funding). His voting pattern shows consistent opposition to social safety-net expansions and regulatory frameworks, alongside support for defense and certain education initiatives. Attendance was 45.4%, with 302 missed votes.
Opposed immigration restrictions in 21 of 24 mapped votes (HIGH confidence)
Opposed climate and environmental measures in 30 of 37 climate votes and 36 of 42 environmental votes (HIGH confidence)
Supported defense spending in 18 of 30 votes and energy cost measures in 18 of 28 votes (HIGH confidence)
Supported education affordability and public education funding (HIGH confidence on both)
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 27 non-gated high-confidence issues · 6 moderate-confidence issues · 5 limited-evidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.