U.S. House · CA-09
Harder, Josh
DCalifornia 9th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 18, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 10 opposing.
10
Opposing votes
11
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 30 supporting and 4 opposing.
30 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 30 supporting and 1 opposing.
30 supporting · 1 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 13 opposing.
12 supporting · 13 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 9 opposing.
11 supporting · 9 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 7 opposing.
12 supporting · 7 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 12 opposing.
6 supporting · 12 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Harder voted on 331 recorded votes with 59.9% attendance, missing 222 votes. He voted with his party 92.4% of the time. On top-tier issues, he mapped as supporting climate change action and environmental protection, while opposing tax policy increases and healthcare affordability expansions. His record shows mixed patterns on immigration (18 pro, 11 con votes) and criminal justice reform (12 pro, 15 con votes). On social issues, he supported abortion rights and LGBTQ+ rights but opposed women's rights and racial justice measures based on mapped votes. Economic votes reflect opposition to minimum wage increases, job creation measures, and small business support, while supporting affordable housing and workers' rights showed balanced voting.
Voted 36–16 supporting climate change action; 31–18 supporting environmental protection
Opposed tax policy (6–14), healthcare affordability (0–6), and minimum wage increases (0–4)
Supported abortion rights (6–3) and LGBTQ+ rights (7–2)
Mixed record on immigration (18–11) and criminal justice reform (12–15)
- 92.4% party-line voting; 59.9% attendance with 222 missed votes
Signature issues
- Climate Change — Climate Change: 36 pro, 16 con votesHIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Environmental Protection: 31 pro, 18 con votesHIGH confidence
- Abortion Rights — Abortion Rights: 6 pro, 3 con votesHIGH confidence
- Tax Policy — Tax Policy: 6 pro, 14 con votesHIGH confidence
- Immigration — Immigration: 18 pro, 11 con votesHIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 28, 2026 • 32 non-gated high-confidence issues · 2 moderate-confidence issues · 4 limited-evidence issues · 1 evidence-gated issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.