U.S. House · CA-18

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 18 supporting and 3 opposing.
3
Opposing votes
18
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 30 supporting and 4 opposing.
Related funding categories
Funding categories are reported separately from voting evidence and do not imply causation or influence.
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 30 supporting and 1 opposing.
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 14 opposing.
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 3 opposing.
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 8 supporting and 10 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 12 opposing.
Rep. Lofgren's voting record shows consistent support for progressive social and environmental policies. She voted in favor of immigration protections (18 of 21 mapped votes), climate action (30 of 34), gun control measures (5 of 5), abortion rights (5 of 5), and LGBTQ+ rights (5 of 5). On economic issues, she supported affordable housing, workers' rights, trade policy, and infrastructure investment. Her record shows opposition to several healthcare expansion measures and public education funding increases, voting against these in mapped roll calls. She took neutral stances on government spending and defense spending, with mixed vote patterns on each. Attendance was notably low at 58.6%, with 229 missed votes out of 553 total.
Strong support for immigration, climate, gun control, and LGBTQ+ rights based on mapped votes
Consistent opposition to healthcare affordability and public education funding expansion measures
Mixed record on economic regulation; supported trade and infrastructure but opposed energy cost measures
Neutral stance on government and defense spending with balanced vote splits
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 29, 2026 • 25 non-gated high-confidence issues · 2 moderate-confidence issues · 11 limited-evidence issues · 4 evidence-gated issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.