U.S. House · CA-30
Friedman, Laura
DCalifornia 30th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 20, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 18 supporting and 3 opposing.
3
Opposing votes
18
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 30 supporting and 4 opposing.
30 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
Friedman's voting record on environmental protection shows a mixed pattern: 31 votes supporting strong regulations, 21 opposing them.
29 supporting · 1 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 14 opposing.
11 supporting · 14 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 15 supporting and 4 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
15 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 9 supporting and 10 opposing.
9 supporting · 10 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 7 supporting and 11 opposing.
7 supporting · 11 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Friedman's voting record shows consistent opposition to economic expansion and social spending across a broad range of issues. She opposed government spending (38 of 56 votes), job creation (13 of 13 votes), and infrastructure investment (9 of 13 votes). On social issues, she opposed women's rights (12 of 12 votes), racial justice (9 of 11 votes), and childcare affordability (6 of 6 votes). She supported immigration (24 of 26 votes), climate change action (34 of 47 votes), gun control (4 of 5 votes), abortion rights (4 of 5 votes), and LGBTQ+ rights (5 of 5 votes). She took neutral stances on voting rights, criminal justice reform, workers' rights, and environmental protection. Attendance was 59.1%, with 226 missed votes.
Opposed government spending, job creation, and infrastructure investment consistently
Supported immigration, climate change action, gun control, abortion rights, and LGBTQ+ rights
Opposed women's rights, racial justice, and childcare affordability across all mapped votes
Took neutral positions on voting rights, criminal justice reform, and environmental protection
- Missed 226 votes; 97.2% party-line voting record
Signature issues
- Government Spending — Opposed government spending (18 pro, 38 con)HIGH confidence
- Immigration — Supported immigration (24 pro, 2 con)HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Supported climate change action (34 pro, 13 con)HIGH confidence
- Job Creation — Opposed job creation (0 pro, 13 con)HIGH confidence
- Women's Rights — Opposed women's rights (0 pro, 12 con)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 23, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.