U.S. House · CA-40
Kim, Young
RCalifornia 40th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 21, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 23 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
11 supporting · 23 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 18 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
13 supporting · 18 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 20 supporting and 5 opposing.
20 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 15 opposing.
5 supporting · 15 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 2 opposing.
17 supporting · 2 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 4 opposing.
14 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Kim voted with her party 100% of the time on 330 recorded votes, though she missed 223 votes (59.7% attendance). On top-tier issues, she opposed immigration (24 of 30 mapped votes against) and gun control (6 of 9 against), while supporting healthcare affordability (6 of 6 for) and public education funding (10 of 15 for). Her record shows mixed or neutral positions on climate change, tax policy, and government spending—each with substantial vote counts but divided outcomes. She opposed criminal justice reform (20 of 27 against) and abortion rights (6 of 9 against), but supported defense spending (21 of 33 for) and renewable energy (6 of 9 for). Notable inconsistencies include stated support for affordable housing despite voting against it 5 of 6 times, and stated support for trade policy while voting against it 12 of 13 times.
Opposed immigration (24 of 30 votes), gun control (6 of 9), and criminal justice reform (20 of 27)
Supported healthcare affordability (6 of 6), public education funding (10 of 15), and defense spending (21 of 33)
Neutral or mixed on climate change, tax policy, and government spending despite stated support
100% party-line voting record; missed 223 of 553 total votes (59.7% attendance)
- Stated support for affordable housing and trade policy contradicted by voting records (5 of 6 and 12 of 13 votes against, respectively)
Signature issues
- Immigration — Opposed immigration (24 of 30 mapped votes against)HIGH confidence
- Healthcare Affordability — Supported healthcare affordability (6 of 6 mapped votes for)HIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Supported defense spending (21 of 33 mapped votes for)HIGH confidence
- Criminal Justice Reform — Opposed criminal justice reform (20 of 27 mapped votes against)HIGH confidence
- Public Education Funding — Supported public education funding (10 of 15 mapped votes for)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 28, 2026 • 32 non-gated high-confidence issues · 2 moderate-confidence issues · 4 limited-evidence issues · 1 evidence-gated issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.