U.S. House · CA-50

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 4 opposing.
4
Opposing votes
17
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 33 mapped decisive vote(s): 29 supporting and 4 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
Scott Peters' recorded votes on environmental regulation show a mixed pattern, with slightly more votes against strong environmental rules than for them.
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 12 opposing.
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 16 supporting and 3 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
Peters usually votes against increases to defense spending, favoring redirection of funds to domestic programs. His voting record on 42 mapped defense bills shows 34 votes aligned with spending reduction.
High confidence based on 17 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 11 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
Rep. Peters voted with his party 94.8% of the time. On top-tier issues, he mapped as supporting immigration (25 of 30 votes), climate change (35 of 51 votes), gun control (6 of 9 votes), abortion rights (6 of 9 votes), criminal justice reform (17 of 26 votes), and LGBTQ+ rights (7 of 9 votes). He mapped as opposing healthcare affordability (0 of 6 votes), public education funding (3 of 13 votes), and government spending (19 of 48 votes). On economic issues, his record shows mixed patterns: he opposed minimum wage increases (0 of 4 votes) and tax increases (7 of 20 votes), but supported affordable housing and workers' rights with narrow margins. Attendance was 58.8%, with 228 votes missed.
Supported immigration (25 of 30 mapped votes)
Supported climate change action (35 of 51 mapped votes)
Opposed government spending increases (19 of 48 mapped votes)
Opposed healthcare affordability measures (0 of 6 mapped votes)
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 28, 2026 • 32 non-gated high-confidence issues · 2 moderate-confidence issues · 4 limited-evidence issues · 1 evidence-gated issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.