U.S. House · CT-05
Hayes, Jahana
DConnecticut 5th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Apr 21, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 15 supporting and 6 opposing.
6
Opposing votes
15
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 29 supporting and 5 opposing.
29 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 30 mapped decisive vote(s): 29 supporting and 1 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
29 supporting · 1 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 13 opposing.
12 supporting · 13 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 15 supporting and 5 opposing.
15 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 9 supporting and 9 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
9 supporting · 9 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 12 opposing.
6 supporting · 12 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Hayes voted with her party 97.2% of the time. She mapped as supporting immigration, climate change, gun control, abortion rights, and LGBTQ+ rights based on 21, 33, 4, 4, and 5 pro votes respectively. She mapped as opposing government spending (36 con votes), defense spending (35 con votes), energy costs (33 con votes), and job creation (13 con votes with zero pro votes). She showed neutral patterns on tax policy, voting rights, criminal justice reform, workers' rights, and environmental protection, with mixed vote distributions. Attendance was 59%, with 227 votes missed.
Mapped as supporting immigration (21 pro, 5 con), climate change (33 pro, 14 con), gun control, abortion rights, and LGBTQ+ rights
Mapped as opposing government spending (36 con), defense spending (35 con), energy costs (33 con), and job creation (13 con, 0 pro)
Neutral patterns on tax policy, voting rights, criminal justice reform, and environmental protection
97.2% party-line voting; 59% attendance with 227 votes missed
- Con votes on healthcare affordability, public education funding, minimum wage, and affordable housing
Signature issues
- Immigration — Mapped as supporting immigration based on 21 pro vs. 5 con votesHIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Mapped as supporting climate change based on 33 pro vs. 14 con votesHIGH confidence
- Government Spending — Mapped as opposing government spending based on 36 con vs. 20 pro votesHIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Mapped as opposing defense spending based on 35 con vs. 6 pro votesHIGH confidence
- LGBTQ+ Rights — Mapped as supporting LGBTQ+ rights based on 5 pro vs. 0 con votesHIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.