U.S. House · FL-14

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 18 supporting and 3 opposing.
3
Opposing votes
18
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
Castor's recorded votes on climate and energy bills align more often with strong climate action and clean energy transition. She voted for such measures in about 70% of mapped votes.
Rep. Castor's recorded votes on environmental bills align more often with stronger regulations and conservation efforts than with reducing environmental rules.
High confidence based on 23 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 11 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
Castor's voting record on criminal justice shows a mixed pattern, with slightly more votes aligned with reducing incarceration and police reform than with tougher law-and-order approaches.
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 6 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 12 opposing.
Rep. Castor voted with her party 97.8% of the time. On top-tier issues, she mapped as supporting immigration (24 of 26 votes), climate change (33 of 47 votes), gun control (4 of 5 votes), abortion rights (4 of 5 votes), and LGBTQ+ rights (5 of 5 votes). She mapped as opposing healthcare affordability (0 of 7 votes), public education funding (5 of 24 votes), government spending (20 of 53 votes), and voting rights showed a split pattern (7 of 14 votes each direction). Across a broad range of economic, social, and defense issues, she consistently mapped as opposing: tax policy, minimum wage, affordable housing, defense spending, renewable energy, racial justice, women's rights, infrastructure investment, veterans affairs, trade policy, and numerous other categories. Environmental protection was an exception, with 32 of 53 votes supporting. Attendance was 58.6%, with 229 votes missed.
Voted with party 97.8% of the time; missed 229 of 553 total votes
Mapped as supporting
immigration (24/26), climate change (33/47), gun control (4/5), abortion rights (4/5), LGBTQ+ rights (5/5)
Mapped as opposing
healthcare affordability (0/7), public education funding (5/24), government spending (20/53), defense spending (9/41), environmental protection (32/53 supporting)
Consistent opposition pattern across economic issues: tax policy, minimum wage, affordable housing, trade policy, job creation
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.