U.S. House · FL-20

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 18 supporting and 3 opposing.
3
Opposing votes
18
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 29 supporting and 5 opposing.
Related funding categories
Funding categories are reported separately from voting evidence and do not imply causation or influence.
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 30 supporting and 1 opposing.
High confidence based on 22 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 10 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 16 supporting and 3 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 17 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 11 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 15 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 5 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick's voting record shows consistent opposition to economic expansion and social spending across most major issues. She voted to support immigration (24 of 26 mapped votes) and climate change measures (33 of 47), as well as abortion rights and LGBTQ+ rights. However, she opposed tax policy, government spending, defense spending, healthcare programs (Medicare, Medicaid, healthcare affordability), education funding, and most economic initiatives including minimum wage increases, affordable housing, and infrastructure investment. She took neutral positions on voting rights, criminal justice reform, workers' rights, and environmental protection. Her attendance record shows 57.7% participation with 234 missed votes. Party-line voting stands at 97.5%.
Supported immigration (24 pro, 2 con) and climate change action (33 pro, 14 con)
Opposed government spending (33 con, 19 pro) and defense spending (29 con, 8 pro)
Opposed healthcare affordability (7 con, 0 pro) and education funding (15 con, 4 pro)
Supported abortion rights (4 pro, 1 con) and LGBTQ+ rights (5 pro, 0 con)
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 27, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.