U.S. House · IL-09

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 3 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
3
Opposing votes
17
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 29 supporting and 5 opposing.
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 30 supporting and 1 opposing.
High confidence based on 24 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 12 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 2 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 9 opposing.
High confidence based on 16 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 12 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
Rep. Schakowsky's voting record shows consistent support for progressive social and environmental policies. She voted in favor of immigration protections (17 of 20 mapped votes), climate action (29 of 34), gun control measures (6 of 6), abortion rights (5 of 5), and criminal justice reform (17 of 19). On economic issues, she supported workers' rights (8 of 10), infrastructure investment, and job creation, though she opposed several healthcare-related measures based on limited vote evidence. She took neutral positions on defense spending (10 pro, 9 con) and renewable energy (3 pro, 3 con). Her voting attendance was 57.7%, with 234 missed votes. She voted with her party 98.4% of the time.
Strong support for immigration, climate action, gun control, and abortion rights based on high-confidence vote records
Consistent backing of workers' rights, infrastructure, and job creation measures
Neutral stance on defense spending and renewable energy with balanced vote splits
Opposed healthcare affordability, Medicare, and Medicaid measures based on limited vote evidence
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated Jun 1, 2026 • 24 non-gated high-confidence issues · 4 moderate-confidence issues · 10 limited-evidence issues · 3 evidence-gated issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.