U.S. House · IL-15
Miller, Mary E.
RIllinois 15th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 22, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 33 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 27 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
6 supporting · 27 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 30 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 25 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
5 supporting · 25 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 20 supporting and 5 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
20 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 15 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
4 supporting · 15 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 16 supporting and 3 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
16 supporting · 3 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 17 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 4 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
13 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Miller voted with her party 93.8% of the time. She opposed immigration (20 vs. 1 vote), climate change action (27 vs. 6), gun control measures (6 vs. 0), abortion rights (5 vs. 0), and environmental protection (25 vs. 5). She supported tax policy (7 vs. 4), government spending (20 vs. 5), defense spending (16 vs. 3), veterans affairs (13 vs. 0), and small business support (13 vs. 2). She showed mixed or limited evidence on healthcare affordability, minimum wage, and social security. Attendance was 58%, with 232 missed votes.
Opposed immigration, climate change, gun control, abortion rights, environmental protection
Supported tax policy, government spending, defense spending, veterans affairs, small business
93.8% party-line voting; 58% attendance with 232 missed votes
Mixed or limited evidence on healthcare, minimum wage, social security
- Neutral stance on trade policy and infrastructure investment
Signature issues
- Immigration — Opposed immigration (1 supporting, 20 opposing votes)HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Opposed climate change action (6 supporting, 27 opposing votes)HIGH confidence
- Tax Policy — Supported tax policy (7 supporting, 4 opposing votes)HIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Supported defense spending (16 supporting, 3 opposing votes)HIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Opposed environmental protection (5 supporting, 25 opposing votes)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 29, 2026 • 24 non-gated high-confidence issues · 4 moderate-confidence issues · 10 limited-evidence issues · 3 evidence-gated issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.