U.S. House · IN-01

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 7 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
7
Opposing votes
12
Supporting votes
22 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 32 mapped decisive vote(s): 27 supporting and 5 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 28 mapped decisive vote(s): 26 supporting and 2 opposing with 4 absence/present vote(s).
Mrvan's voting record on government spending bills shows a pattern of supporting spending reductions. He voted against increased spending proposals in 38 of 56 mapped votes.
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 6 opposing.
High confidence based on 17 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 3 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 17 mapped decisive vote(s): 7 supporting and 10 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
Rep. Mrvan votes with his party 92.8% of the time. On top-tier issues, he shows strong support for immigration (12 pro, 7 con votes), climate action (27 pro, 5 con), and gun control (6 pro, 0 con). He also supports criminal justice reform, environmental protection, and LGBTQ+ rights based on mapped votes. On economic issues, he backs workers' rights, affordable housing, and infrastructure investment, but opposes renewable energy and shows mixed positions on government spending and education funding. Healthcare stances are limited: he opposed mapped votes on affordability, Medicare, and Medicaid. Attendance is notably low at 57.5%, with 235 missed votes out of 553 total.
Strong support for immigration, climate change, and gun control based on mapped votes
Consistent backing of criminal justice reform, environmental protection, and workers' rights
Mixed or opposing stances on renewable energy, healthcare affordability programs, and foreign aid
92.8% party-line voting; 57.5% attendance with 235 missed votes
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 29, 2026 • 23 non-gated high-confidence issues · 5 moderate-confidence issues · 10 limited-evidence issues · 3 evidence-gated issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.