U.S. House · LA-06
Fields, Cleo
DLouisiana 6th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 19, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 3 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
3
Opposing votes
17
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 33 mapped decisive vote(s): 28 supporting and 5 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
28 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 28 mapped decisive vote(s): 27 supporting and 1 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
27 supporting · 1 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 13 opposing.
12 supporting · 13 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 15 supporting and 4 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
15 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 8 opposing.
11 supporting · 8 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 12 opposing.
6 supporting · 12 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Fields voted on 321 recorded measures with 97.8% party-line alignment. On top-tier issues, she mapped as supporting immigration, climate change, gun control, and abortion rights, while opposing tax policy, healthcare affordability, public education funding, and government spending. She showed mixed or neutral positions on voting rights, criminal justice reform, workers' rights, and environmental protection. Across lower-tier issues, she opposed most economic and social spending measures, including affordable housing, minimum wage increases, and defense spending. Attendance was 58%, with 232 votes missed.
Voted pro on immigration (23 of 25 mapped votes), climate change (31 of 45), gun control (4 of 5), and abortion rights (4 of 5)
Voted con on tax policy (15 of 23), government spending (36 of 56), and defense spending (34 of 42)
Opposed most social and economic spending
education affordability, affordable housing, minimum wage, childcare, food security
Mixed record on environmental protection (25 pro, 22 con of 47 votes) and criminal justice reform (16 pro, 14 con of 30 votes)
- 97.8% party-line voting; 58% attendance with 232 missed votes
Signature issues
- Immigration — Voted pro on immigration (23 of 25 mapped votes)HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Voted pro on climate change (31 of 45 mapped votes)HIGH confidence
- Tax Policy — Voted con on tax policy (15 of 23 mapped votes)HIGH confidence
- Government Spending — Voted con on government spending (36 of 56 mapped votes)HIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Voted con on defense spending (34 of 42 mapped votes)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 23, 2026 • 37 non-gated high-confidence issues · 1 moderate-confidence issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.