U.S. House · MD-03
Elfreth, Sarah
DMaryland 3rd38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 20, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 18 supporting and 3 opposing.
3
Opposing votes
18
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 29 supporting and 5 opposing.
29 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 30 supporting and 1 opposing.
30 supporting · 1 opposingHIGH confidence
Elfreth's voting record on spending bills shows a pattern of supporting deficit reduction. She voted against increased spending proposals in 37 of 56 mapped votes.
11 supporting · 14 opposingHIGH confidence
Elfreth's voting record on criminal justice shows a mixed pattern, with nearly equal support for bills favoring reform and those favoring stronger enforcement.
16 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 7 opposing.
12 supporting · 7 opposingHIGH confidence
Elfreth's recorded votes on energy-cost bills align more often with prioritizing domestic fossil fuel production. She voted for such measures in 12 of 18 mapped votes.
6 supporting · 12 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Elfreth voted with her party 98.2% of the time across 332 recorded votes, though she missed 221 votes (60% attendance). On top-tier issues, she mapped as supporting immigration (24 of 26 votes pro), climate change (33 of 47 votes pro), gun control (4 of 5 votes pro), abortion rights (4 of 5 votes pro), and LGBTQ+ rights (5 of 5 votes pro). She mapped as opposing tax policy (15 of 24 votes con), healthcare affordability (7 of 7 votes con), public education funding (19 of 24 votes con), and government spending (37 of 56 votes con). On criminal justice reform and voting rights, her votes split roughly evenly. Across economic issues—including minimum wage, affordable housing, workers' rights, defense spending, and trade policy—she consistently opposed mapped measures.
Voted pro on immigration (24–2), climate change (33–14), gun control (4–1), abortion rights (4–1), and LGBTQ+ rights (5–0).
Voted con on tax policy (9–15), healthcare affordability (0–7), public education funding (5–19), and government spending (19–37).
Opposed most economic measures
minimum wage (2–7), affordable housing (1–6), defense spending (9–33), and trade policy (3–14).
Mixed or neutral stance on criminal justice reform (17–14) and voting rights (8–6).
- 98.2% party-line voting; 60% attendance (221 missed votes).
Signature issues
- Immigration — Immigration: 24 pro, 2 con votes mapped.HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Climate Change: 33 pro, 14 con votes mapped.HIGH confidence
- Tax Policy — Tax Policy: 9 pro, 15 con votes mapped.HIGH confidence
- Government Spending — Government Spending: 19 pro, 37 con votes mapped.HIGH confidence
- LGBTQ+ Rights — LGBTQ+ Rights: 5 pro, 0 con votes mapped.HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 23, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.