U.S. House · MI-10
James, John
RMichigan 10th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 26, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 33 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 23 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
10 supporting · 23 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 28 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 17 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
11 supporting · 17 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 22 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 5 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
17 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 15 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
4 supporting · 15 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 4 opposing.
14 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 17 mapped decisive vote(s): 15 supporting and 2 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
15 supporting · 2 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. James voted on 291 recorded votes with 52.6% attendance, missing 262 votes. He voted with his party 100% of the time. His record shows consistent opposition to immigration restrictions, climate and environmental measures, social safety net expansions, and voting rights protections. He supported defense spending and foreign aid. On education and energy costs, he voted in support. His stances on healthcare affordability, government spending, infrastructure investment, and food security showed mixed voting patterns.
Opposed immigration restrictions (22 of 26 mapped votes against)
Opposed climate change and environmental protection measures (71 of 94 mapped votes against)
Supported defense spending (27 of 39 mapped votes for) and foreign aid (16 of 22 mapped votes for)
Supported education affordability and public education funding (28 of 36 mapped votes for)
- 100% party-line voting record with 52.6% attendance
Signature issues
- Immigration — Opposed immigration restrictions (4 for, 22 against)HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Opposed climate change measures (12 for, 34 against)HIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Supported defense spending (27 for, 12 against)HIGH confidence
- Education Affordability — Supported education affordability (13 for, 2 against)HIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Opposed environmental protection (11 for, 37 against)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 26, 2026 • 36 non-gated high-confidence issues · 2 moderate-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.