U.S. House · MI-12
Tlaib, Rashida
DMichigan 12th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 18, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
Tlaib's recorded votes on immigration bills lean toward supporting pathways to citizenship and expanded legal immigration, though her voting record shows mixed positions on some measures.
1
Opposing votes
18
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 28 supporting and 6 opposing.
28 supporting · 6 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 30 mapped decisive vote(s): 28 supporting and 2 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
28 supporting · 2 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 14 opposing.
11 supporting · 14 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 16 supporting and 4 opposing.
16 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 8 supporting and 11 opposing.
8 supporting · 11 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 12 opposing.
6 supporting · 12 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Tlaib's voting record shows consistent support for immigration, climate action, gun control, criminal justice reform, and LGBTQ+ rights—all mapped as HIGH confidence based on 19–31 decisive votes per issue. She opposed healthcare affordability measures, government spending, and defense spending across 5–56 mapped votes each. Her record on economic issues (tax policy, workers' rights, trade policy, environmental protection) shows mixed patterns with roughly balanced pro and con votes. Attendance at 57.3% reflects 236 missed votes against 317 cast. Party-line voting stands at 92.7%.
Supported immigration (19 of 23 mapped votes), climate change (30 of 47), and criminal justice reform (19 of 31)
Opposed government spending (42 of 56 votes), defense spending (36 of 42), and healthcare affordability (7 of 7)
Mixed or neutral stance on tax policy, environmental protection, workers' rights, and trade policy
Voted with party 92.7% of the time; missed 236 votes (attendance 57.3%)
- All stances mapped from recorded roll-call votes with HIGH confidence across 41 issues
Signature issues
- Immigration — Supported immigration: 19 pro, 4 con votesHIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Supported climate change: 30 pro, 17 con votesHIGH confidence
- Government Spending — Opposed government spending: 14 pro, 42 con votesHIGH confidence
- Criminal Justice Reform — Supported criminal justice reform: 19 pro, 12 con votesHIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Opposed defense spending: 6 pro, 36 con votesHIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 26, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.