U.S. House · MN-05

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 18 supporting and 2 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
2
Opposing votes
18
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
Voting record shows more support than opposition to climate action bills, though mapped stance is labeled skeptical of regulation.
High confidence based on 30 mapped decisive vote(s): 29 supporting and 1 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 24 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 14 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 3 opposing.
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 7 supporting and 12 opposing.
High confidence based on 16 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 12 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
Rep. Omar's voting record shows consistent opposition across economic, fiscal, and spending measures, with 96.3% party-line voting. She supports immigration, climate action, gun control, abortion rights, and LGBTQ+ rights. However, her record on healthcare affordability, education costs, government spending, defense spending, and trade policy is marked by opposition votes. She maintains neutral stances on voting rights, criminal justice reform, workers' rights, and environmental protection—areas where her mapped votes split between support and opposition. Attendance is notably low at 58%, with 232 missed votes.
Supports immigration (22 of 25 mapped votes), climate change action (31 of 45), gun control (4 of 5), abortion rights (4 of 5), and LGBTQ+ rights (5 of 5)
Opposes government spending (38 of 55 votes), defense spending (37 of 42), and tax policy increases (14 of 23 opposing)
Opposes healthcare affordability measures (7 of 7 votes), education affordability (16 of 17), and energy costs (33 of 40)
Neutral on voting rights (8 supporting, 6 opposing of 14 votes) and environmental protection (30 supporting, 21 opposing of 51 votes)
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.