U.S. House · NC-01
Davis, Donald G.
DNorth Carolina 1st38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 26, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 16 opposing.
16
Opposing votes
5
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 23 supporting and 11 opposing.
23 supporting · 11 opposingHIGH confidence
Related funding categories
Alternative Energy Production & Services $7K
Funding categories are reported separately from voting evidence and do not imply causation or influence.
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 25 supporting and 6 opposing.
25 supporting · 6 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 16 supporting and 9 opposing.
16 supporting · 9 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 9 opposing.
11 supporting · 9 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 2 opposing.
17 supporting · 2 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 6 opposing.
12 supporting · 6 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Davis shows a mixed voting record across major issues. On economic matters, he opposed government spending (36 opposing vs. 20 supporting votes) and defense spending (32 opposing vs. 10 supporting), but his votes on tax policy and trade policy lean against stated pro-stances. On social issues, recorded votes diverge notably from manual stances: he voted against abortion rights expansion (4 supporting vs. 1 opposing) and LGBTQ+ rights measures (3 supporting vs. 2 opposing). Environmental votes show near-balance on climate change (27 supporting vs. 20 opposing) and environmental protection (27 supporting vs. 26 opposing). Healthcare stances are marked by opposition votes on affordability, Medicare, and Medicaid despite pro-stance labels. Attendance is 59.7%, with 223 missed votes. Party-line voting is 78.8%.
Opposed government spending in 56 mapped votes (36 con, 20 pro)
Opposed defense spending in 42 mapped votes (32 con, 10 pro)
Voted against abortion rights expansion (4 pro, 1 con) despite pro-stance label
Voted against LGBTQ+ rights measures (3 pro, 2 con) despite pro-stance label
- Missed 223 votes; attended 59.7% of recorded votes
Signature issues
- Government Spending — Opposed government spending in 56 mapped votes (36 con, 20 pro)HIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Opposed defense spending in 42 mapped votes (32 con, 10 pro)HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Climate change votes near-balanced: 27 supporting, 20 opposing across 47 mapped votesHIGH confidence
- Abortion Rights — Voted against abortion rights expansion (4 pro, 1 con) in 5 mapped votesHIGH confidence
- Healthcare Affordability — Voted against healthcare affordability measures in all 7 mapped votesHIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 26, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.