U.S. House · NC-07
Rouzer, David
RNorth Carolina 7th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 20, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 32 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 21 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
11 supporting · 21 opposingHIGH confidence
Rouzer's voting record on environmental regulation shows a pattern of voting against measures that expand environmental protections, with 34 votes against compared to 17 in favor.
13 supporting · 16 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 20 supporting and 5 opposing.
20 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 15 opposing.
5 supporting · 15 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 2 opposing.
17 supporting · 2 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 4 opposing.
14 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Rouzer voted with his party 100% of the time across 328 recorded votes, with no party deviations. He missed 225 votes (59.3% attendance). His mapped record shows consistent opposition to immigration restrictions, climate and environmental measures, social safety-net expansions, and voting rights protections. He supported defense spending, foreign aid, education affordability, and energy cost controls. On economic issues, he opposed minimum wage increases, workers' rights protections, and trade expansions, while showing mixed positions on government spending and infrastructure. All stances are based on high-confidence mappings from 5 to 56 decisive votes per issue.
100% party-line voting record across 328 votes cast; 225 votes missed
Opposed immigration (22 of 26 votes), climate action (33 of 45 votes), environmental protection (39 of 51 votes)
Supported defense spending (27 of 42 votes), foreign aid (16 of 23 votes), education affordability (13 of 17 votes)
Opposed workers' rights (12 of 18 votes), minimum wage increases (6 of 9 votes), trade expansions (16 of 17 votes)
- Mixed positions on government spending (32 supporting, 24 opposing) and infrastructure investment (6 supporting, 8 opposing)
Signature issues
- Immigration — Opposed immigration restrictions (4 supporting, 22 opposing)HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Opposed climate change measures (12 supporting, 33 opposing)HIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Supported defense spending (27 supporting, 15 opposing)HIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Opposed environmental protection (12 supporting, 39 opposing)HIGH confidence
- Education Affordability — Supported education affordability (13 supporting, 4 opposing)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.