U.S. House · NC-10
Harrigan, Pat
RNorth Carolina 10th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 18, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
22 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 8 supporting and 26 opposing.
8 supporting · 26 opposingHIGH confidence
Related funding categories
Oil & Gas $5K
Funding categories are reported separately from voting evidence and do not imply causation or influence.
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 25 opposing.
6 supporting · 25 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 19 supporting and 6 opposing.
19 supporting · 6 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 14 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
5 supporting · 14 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 5 opposing.
14 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
Harrigan's voting record on energy costs shows a pattern of support for clean energy policies. In 42 mapped votes, he voted in favor 27 times and against 15 times.
14 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Harrigan voted on 327 recorded votes with 92.7% party-line alignment. On top-tier issues, he opposed immigration (21 of 25 mapped votes), climate change (32 of 47), and tax policy (16 of 24). He supported public education funding (15 of 24) and defense spending (28 of 42). On healthcare affordability and government spending, his votes split roughly evenly. Attendance was 59.1%, with 226 votes missed.
Opposed immigration, climate change, environmental protection, and criminal justice reform across 25–53 mapped votes each
Supported public education funding, education affordability, defense spending, and foreign aid
Mixed or neutral stance on healthcare affordability, government spending, technology regulation, and infrastructure investment
92.7% party-line voting; 59.1% attendance with 226 missed votes
- Consistent opposition on social issues (abortion rights, LGBTQ+ rights, racial justice) and economic regulations (minimum wage, workers' rights)
Signature issues
- Immigration — Opposed immigration (21 Con vs. 4 Pro votes)HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Opposed climate change action (32 Con vs. 15 Pro votes)HIGH confidence
- Public Education Funding — Supported public education funding (15 Pro vs. 9 Con votes)HIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Supported defense spending (28 Pro vs. 14 Con votes)HIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Opposed environmental protection (34 Con vs. 19 Pro votes)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 23, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.