U.S. House · NC-12

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 18 supporting and 3 opposing.
3
Opposing votes
18
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
Rep. Adams' recorded votes on climate and energy bills align more often with strong climate action and clean energy transition. 33 of 47 mapped votes support this direction.
Adams' voting record on environmental protection shows a mixed pattern: she voted for stronger regulations in about 59% of mapped votes, with the remainder opposing or abstaining.
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 13 opposing.
Adams's voting record on criminal justice shows a mixed pattern, with slightly more votes aligning with reform approaches than law-and-order positions.
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 8 opposing.
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 12 opposing.
Rep. Adams voted with her party 99.1% of the time. She mapped as supporting immigration, climate change, gun control, abortion rights, and LGBTQ+ rights based on recorded votes. She mapped as opposing government spending, defense spending, and most economic and social policies including healthcare affordability, public education funding, and women's rights. She took neutral positions on tax policy, voting rights, criminal justice reform, workers' rights, and environmental protection. Attendance was 59.9%, with 222 missed votes out of 553 total.
Voted with party 99.1% of the time; missed 222 of 553 votes
Mapped as supporting immigration (24 of 26 votes), climate change (33 of 47), and LGBTQ+ rights (5 of 5)
Mapped as opposing government spending (36 of 56), defense spending (34 of 42), and most economic policies
Neutral stance on tax policy (10 pro, 14 con), voting rights (8 pro, 6 con), and environmental protection (31 pro, 22 con)
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.