U.S. House · NC-14
Moore, Tim
RNorth Carolina 14th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 18, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 0 supporting and 20 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
20
Opposing votes
0
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
Moore's voting record on climate and energy bills shows a pattern of opposing emissions limits and clean energy mandates. He voted against such measures in 35 of 47 mapped votes.
11 supporting · 23 opposingHIGH confidence
Related funding categories
Oil & Gas $7K
Funding categories are reported separately from voting evidence and do not imply causation or influence.
Moore's voting record on environmental bills shows a pattern of supporting measures that reduce regulations. He voted against environmental protections in 36 of 53 mapped votes.
13 supporting · 18 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 24 mapped decisive vote(s): 19 supporting and 5 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
19 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 15 opposing.
5 supporting · 15 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 2 opposing.
17 supporting · 2 opposingHIGH confidence
Moore's voting record on energy costs leans toward support for clean energy policies. In 42 mapped votes, he voted for clean energy approaches 67% of the time.
14 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Moore voted on 330 recorded measures with 99.4% party-line alignment and 0.6% deviation. Attendance was 59.7%, with 223 missed votes. Across 41 mapped issues, he opposed immigration restrictions (7 pro, 18 con), climate action (16 pro, 31 con), tax increases (8 pro, 16 con), gun regulations (1 pro, 4 con), voting rights expansion (2 pro, 12 con), and criminal justice reform (9 pro, 22 con). He supported defense spending (26 pro, 16 con), foreign aid (16 pro, 7 con), and education affordability (13 pro, 4 con). Mixed or neutral stances appeared on healthcare affordability, government spending, women's rights, infrastructure, and data privacy. All stances rest on mapped roll-call votes with HIGH confidence.
Opposed immigration restrictions, climate action, and environmental protection across 25–53 mapped votes each
Supported defense spending (26 pro) and foreign aid (16 pro); opposed trade agreements (0 pro, 17 con)
Mixed stance on government spending (30 pro, 24 con) and healthcare affordability (3 pro, 4 con)
99.4% party-line voting; 59.7% attendance with 223 missed votes
- Supported education affordability (13 pro, 4 con) and energy cost relief (28 pro, 14 con)
Signature issues
- Immigration — Opposed immigration restrictions (7 pro, 18 con across 25 votes)HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Opposed climate action (16 pro, 31 con across 47 votes)HIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Supported defense spending (26 pro, 16 con across 42 votes)HIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Opposed environmental protection (17 pro, 36 con across 53 votes)HIGH confidence
- Education Affordability — Supported education affordability (13 pro, 4 con across 17 votes)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.