U.S. House · NC-14

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 0 supporting and 20 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
20
Opposing votes
0
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
Moore's voting record on climate and energy bills shows a pattern of opposing emissions limits and clean energy mandates. He voted against such measures in 35 of 47 mapped votes.
Related funding categories
Funding categories are reported separately from voting evidence and do not imply causation or influence.
Moore's voting record on environmental bills shows a pattern of supporting measures that reduce regulations. He voted against environmental protections in 36 of 53 mapped votes.
High confidence based on 24 mapped decisive vote(s): 19 supporting and 5 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 15 opposing.
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 2 opposing.
Moore's voting record on energy costs leans toward support for clean energy policies. In 42 mapped votes, he voted for clean energy approaches 67% of the time.
Rep. Moore voted on 330 recorded measures with 99.4% party-line alignment and 0.6% deviation. Attendance was 59.7%, with 223 missed votes. Across 41 mapped issues, he opposed immigration restrictions (7 pro, 18 con), climate action (16 pro, 31 con), tax increases (8 pro, 16 con), gun regulations (1 pro, 4 con), voting rights expansion (2 pro, 12 con), and criminal justice reform (9 pro, 22 con). He supported defense spending (26 pro, 16 con), foreign aid (16 pro, 7 con), and education affordability (13 pro, 4 con). Mixed or neutral stances appeared on healthcare affordability, government spending, women's rights, infrastructure, and data privacy. All stances rest on mapped roll-call votes with HIGH confidence.
Opposed immigration restrictions, climate action, and environmental protection across 25–53 mapped votes each
Supported defense spending (26 pro) and foreign aid (16 pro); opposed trade agreements (0 pro, 17 con)
Mixed stance on government spending (30 pro, 24 con) and healthcare affordability (3 pro, 4 con)
99.4% party-line voting; 59.7% attendance with 223 missed votes
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.