U.S. House · NE-01
Flood, Mike
RNebraska 1st38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 24, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 2 supporting and 19 opposing.
19
Opposing votes
2
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 11 supporting and 23 opposing.
11 supporting · 23 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 18 opposing.
13 supporting · 18 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 20 supporting and 5 opposing.
20 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 15 opposing.
5 supporting · 15 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 2 opposing.
17 supporting · 2 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 4 opposing.
14 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Flood voted on 329 recorded votes with 59.5% attendance and a 99.1% party-line voting rate. Mapped evidence shows consistent opposition across immigration (21 vs. 5 votes), climate change (34 vs. 12), environmental protection (40 vs. 12), and criminal justice reform (24 vs. 7). He supported defense spending (26 vs. 15) and foreign aid (15 vs. 7). On education, he opposed affordability restrictions but supported public education funding (14 vs. 9) and energy cost measures (27 vs. 13). Mixed or neutral patterns appear on government spending, infrastructure, healthcare affordability, and women's rights.
Opposed immigration, climate change, environmental protection, and voting rights in 13–34 mapped votes per issue
Supported defense spending (26 votes) and foreign aid (15 votes)
Supported public education funding (14 votes) and education affordability (12 votes)
99.1% party-line voting; 224 votes missed out of 553 total roll calls
- Neutral or mixed patterns on government spending, infrastructure, and healthcare affordability
Signature issues
- Immigration — Opposed immigration measures in 21 of 26 mapped votesHIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Opposed climate change measures in 34 of 46 mapped votesHIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Supported defense spending in 26 of 41 mapped votesHIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Opposed environmental protection in 40 of 52 mapped votesHIGH confidence
- Education Affordability — Supported education affordability in 12 of 16 mapped votesHIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 27, 2026 • 38 non-gated high-confidence issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.