U.S. House · NJ-11
Sherrill, Mikie
DNew Jersey 11th28 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 28, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 5 mapped decisive vote(s): 3 supporting and 2 opposing with 12 absence/present vote(s).
2
Opposing votes
3
Supporting votes
17 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 13 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 0 opposing with 11 absence/present vote(s).
13 supporting · 0 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 11 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 6 opposing with 7 absence/present vote(s).
5 supporting · 6 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 10 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 0 opposing with 12 absence/present vote(s).
10 supporting · 0 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 7 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 3 opposing with 10 absence/present vote(s).
4 supporting · 3 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 5 mapped decisive vote(s): 3 supporting and 2 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
3 supporting · 2 opposingHIGH confidence
Related funding categories
Real Estate $7K
Funding categories are reported separately from voting evidence and do not imply causation or influence.
Moderate confidence based on 4 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 0 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
4 supporting · 0 opposingMODERATE confidence
What kind of representative is this?
MODERATE confidenceRep. Sherrill's record shows consistent support for climate action and environmental protection, with high-confidence support for voting rights and technology regulation. However, her voting pattern reflects opposition to education affordability, public education funding, and most economic spending measures. She voted against 18 of 27 mapped government spending bills. Her record on immigration shows mixed signals: 4 votes supporting immigration measures but 6 opposing, with limited overall attendance on these votes. Notably, she missed 454 of 553 total votes (82.1% absence rate), which constrains confidence on several issues with thin vote evidence.
Strong support for climate change (10 of 13 decisive votes pro) and environmental protection (9 of 15 pro)
Opposed government spending (18 of 27 decisive votes con) and education affordability (4 of 5 con)
Mixed record on immigration (4 pro, 6 con across 10 mapped votes)
High party-line voting (92.9%), but very low attendance (17.9% of votes cast)
- Limited evidence on gun control, renewable energy, and several tier-2 and tier-3 issues due to sparse mapped votes
Signature issues
- Climate Change — Climate Change: 10 of 13 decisive votes supportingHIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Environmental Protection: 9 of 15 decisive votes supportingHIGH confidence
- Government Spending — Government Spending: 18 of 27 decisive votes opposingHIGH confidence
- Education Affordability — Education Affordability: 4 of 5 decisive votes opposingHIGH confidence
- Voting Rights — Voting Rights: 3 of 4 decisive votes supportingMODERATE confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
28 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 13 non-gated high-confidence issues · 5 moderate-confidence issues · 10 limited-evidence issues · 4 evidence-gated issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.