U.S. House · OH-04

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 32 mapped decisive vote(s): 9 supporting and 23 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 21 opposing.
High confidence based on 24 mapped decisive vote(s): 20 supporting and 4 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
Jim Jordan's voting record on criminal justice bills tends to align with law-and-order approaches. He voted against bills focused on reducing incarceration and police reform in 24 of 31 mapped votes.
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 16 supporting and 3 opposing.
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 4 opposing.
Rep. Jordan voted on 321 recorded measures with 97.8% party-line alignment. His mapped votes show consistent opposition to immigration restrictions, climate action, tax increases, gun regulations, and healthcare expansion. He supported defense spending and foreign aid. On education, he mapped as supporting both public funding and affordability measures. His voting record shows limited engagement, with 232 missed votes (58% attendance).
Opposed on immigration (22 of 26 mapped votes), climate change (28 of 42), and environmental protection (36 of 50)
Supported defense spending (27 of 41 mapped votes) and foreign aid (15 of 22)
Mixed or neutral on government spending (31 pro, 23 con of 54 votes) and renewable energy (6 pro, 8 con of 14)
Supported public education funding (14 of 21 votes) and education affordability (12 of 16 votes)
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 37 non-gated high-confidence issues · 1 moderate-confidence issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.