U.S. House · OH-07

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 3 supporting and 18 opposing.
18
Opposing votes
3
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 33 mapped decisive vote(s): 13 supporting and 20 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 28 mapped decisive vote(s): 15 supporting and 13 opposing with 3 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 20 supporting and 5 opposing.
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 7 supporting and 13 opposing.
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 16 supporting and 2 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 17 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 3 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
Rep. Miller voted on 319 recorded votes with 57.7% attendance, missing 234 votes. Across 41 mapped issues, he shows consistent conservative voting patterns: opposing immigration (22 of 26 votes), climate action (33 of 44), environmental protection (34 of 47), and criminal justice reform (23 of 31). He supported defense spending (26 of 40) and foreign aid (16 of 23). On education, he backed affordability (13 of 17) and public funding (15 of 24). Mixed or neutral positions appear on healthcare, government spending, and infrastructure. He voted with his party 99.1% of the time.
Opposed immigration, climate change, and environmental protection in 22–34 of mapped votes each
Supported defense spending (26 of 40) and foreign aid (16 of 23)
Backed education affordability (13 of 17) and public education funding (15 of 24)
Neutral stance on healthcare, government spending, and infrastructure investment
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 25, 2026 • 37 non-gated high-confidence issues · 1 moderate-confidence issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.