U.S. House · PA-07

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 3 supporting and 18 opposing.
18
Opposing votes
3
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 32 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 20 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 30 mapped decisive vote(s): 15 supporting and 15 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 24 mapped decisive vote(s): 19 supporting and 5 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 7 supporting and 13 opposing.
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 2 opposing.
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 4 opposing.
Rep. Mackenzie voted against immigration restrictions in 4 of 26 mapped votes but opposed in 22, establishing a strong opposing stance. On climate and environmental protection, he opposed 32 of 44 climate votes and 38 of 51 environmental votes. He supported defense spending (27 of 42 votes) and foreign aid (16 of 23 votes). On education, he supported both public education funding (15 of 24) and education affordability (13 of 17). He showed neutral or mixed positions on healthcare, government spending, workers' rights, and infrastructure. Attendance was 59.1% with 226 missed votes. Party-line voting was 96.9%.
Opposed immigration restrictions
22 of 26 mapped votes against
Opposed climate action
32 of 44 climate votes, 38 of 51 environmental votes against
Supported defense spending (27 of 42) and foreign aid (16 of 23)
Supported public education funding (15 of 24) and education affordability (13 of 17)
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 22, 2026 • 37 non-gated high-confidence issues · 1 moderate-confidence issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.