U.S. House · TX-16

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
Escobar's recorded votes on immigration show a mixed pattern, with slightly more votes aligning with pathways to citizenship and legal immigration expansion.
3
Opposing votes
18
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 29 supporting and 5 opposing.
Related funding categories
Funding categories are reported separately from voting evidence and do not imply causation or influence.
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 30 supporting and 1 opposing.
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 15 opposing.
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 16 supporting and 3 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 8 supporting and 11 opposing.
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 6 supporting and 12 opposing.
Rep. Escobar voted with her party 98.2% of the time across 327 recorded votes. She shows strong support for immigration (18 of 21 mapped votes), climate action (29 of 34), gun control (6 of 6), abortion rights (5 of 5), and environmental protection (30 of 31). She opposed government spending (15 of 25 votes), public education funding (5 of 8), and foreign aid (6 of 7). On healthcare and some economic issues, mapped evidence is limited. Attendance was 59.1%, with 226 missed votes.
Voted with party 98.2% of the time; 59.1% attendance rate
Strong support for immigration, climate, gun control, and environmental protection
Opposed government spending, public education funding, and foreign aid
Mixed or limited evidence on healthcare affordability, Medicare, and Medicaid
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 29, 2026 • 25 non-gated high-confidence issues · 3 moderate-confidence issues · 10 limited-evidence issues · 3 evidence-gated issues · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.