U.S. House · TX-22

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 32 mapped decisive vote(s): 8 supporting and 24 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 29 mapped decisive vote(s): 9 supporting and 20 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 22 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 5 opposing with 5 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 20 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 15 opposing.
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 16 supporting and 2 opposing with 2 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 17 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 3 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
Rep. Nehls voted with his party 98.4% of the time across 308 recorded votes, though he missed 245 votes (55.7% attendance). On top-tier issues, he opposed immigration (24 of 30 mapped votes against), gun control (6 of 9 against), abortion rights (6 of 9 against), and criminal justice reform (20 of 27 against). He supported defense spending (19 of 31 for), renewable energy (7 of 9 for), women's rights (10 of 11 for), and healthcare programs including Medicare and Medicaid (5 of 5 each). On climate change and environmental protection, his votes split roughly 32–34 against and 12–17 for, mapped as neutral stances. Several economic issues show mixed patterns: he voted for infrastructure investment and government spending majorities, but against trade policy and small business support majorities.
Opposed immigration (24 vs. 6 mapped votes) and gun control (6 vs. 3).
Supported defense spending (19 vs. 12) and renewable energy (7 vs. 2).
Backed healthcare programs
Medicare and Medicaid (5–0 each), healthcare affordability (5–0).
Mixed on climate and environment
32–34 opposing, 12–17 supporting; mapped as neutral.
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 28, 2026 • 31 non-gated high-confidence issues · 3 moderate-confidence issues · 4 limited-evidence issues · 1 evidence-gated issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.