U.S. House · TX-26

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 7 supporting and 27 opposing.
High confidence based on 30 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 26 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 8 opposing.
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 15 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 5 opposing.
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 4 opposing.
Rep. Gill voted on 323 recorded measures with 58.4% attendance, missing 230 votes. He voted with his party 92.6% of the time. Across 41 mapped issues, he opposed immigration restrictions (4 pro, 22 con), climate action (13 pro, 34 con), and environmental protection (17 pro, 34 con). He supported defense spending (27 pro, 14 con), foreign aid (15 pro, 7 con), and education affordability (13 pro, 4 con). On healthcare and spending, his votes split evenly. Gun control evidence is limited (1 pro, 1 con).
Opposed immigration restrictions, climate action, and environmental protection in 26–51 mapped votes each
Supported defense spending (27 pro), foreign aid (15 pro), and education affordability (13 pro)
Neutral stance on healthcare affordability, government spending, and Medicare
92.6% party-line voting; missed 230 of 553 total votes (58.4% attendance)
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 23, 2026 • 36 non-gated high-confidence issues · 1 moderate-confidence issue · 1 limited-evidence issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.