U.S. House · TX-26
Gill, Brandon
RTexas 26th38 issues mapped from the public record
Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
- Legislator stats: May 29, 2026
- Vote ingest: May 29, 2026
- FEC sync: Mar 20, 2026
- Finance cycle: 2026
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Issue voting record
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 7 supporting and 27 opposing.
7 supporting · 27 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 30 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 26 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
4 supporting · 26 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 8 opposing.
17 supporting · 8 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 4 supporting and 15 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
4 supporting · 15 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 5 opposing.
14 supporting · 5 opposingHIGH confidence
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 4 opposing.
14 supporting · 4 opposingHIGH confidence
What kind of representative is this?
HIGH confidenceRep. Gill voted on 323 recorded measures with 58.4% attendance, missing 230 votes. He voted with his party 92.6% of the time. Across 41 mapped issues, he opposed immigration restrictions (4 pro, 22 con), climate action (13 pro, 34 con), and environmental protection (17 pro, 34 con). He supported defense spending (27 pro, 14 con), foreign aid (15 pro, 7 con), and education affordability (13 pro, 4 con). On healthcare and spending, his votes split evenly. Gun control evidence is limited (1 pro, 1 con).
Opposed immigration restrictions, climate action, and environmental protection in 26–51 mapped votes each
Supported defense spending (27 pro), foreign aid (15 pro), and education affordability (13 pro)
Neutral stance on healthcare affordability, government spending, and Medicare
92.6% party-line voting; missed 230 of 553 total votes (58.4% attendance)
- Limited evidence on gun control (1 pro, 1 con); high confidence on most other issues
Signature issues
- Immigration — Opposed immigration restrictions (4 pro, 22 con across 26 votes)HIGH confidence
- Climate Change — Opposed climate action (13 pro, 34 con across 47 votes)HIGH confidence
- Defense Spending — Supported defense spending (27 pro, 14 con across 41 votes)HIGH confidence
- Environmental Protection — Opposed environmental protection (17 pro, 34 con across 51 votes)HIGH confidence
- Education Affordability — Supported education affordability (13 pro, 4 con across 17 votes)HIGH confidence
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 23, 2026 • 36 non-gated high-confidence issues · 1 moderate-confidence issue · 1 limited-evidence issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
About and public record
Sources & transparency
- Congress.gov — votes and bills
- FEC.gov — campaign finance
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.