U.S. House · UT-04

Stances are based on mapped issues and the public record (Congress.gov, FEC, and related sources). Add your own views to see how you line up.
Public record freshness
Your alignment
Issue spotlight
High confidence based on 21 mapped decisive vote(s): 1 supporting and 20 opposing.
20
Opposing votes
1
Supporting votes
21 votes analyzed
Based on public votes and official records. Browse by topic or sort by confidence.
High confidence based on 34 mapped decisive vote(s): 10 supporting and 24 opposing.
Related funding categories
Funding categories are reported separately from voting evidence and do not imply causation or influence.
High confidence based on 31 mapped decisive vote(s): 12 supporting and 19 opposing.
High confidence based on 25 mapped decisive vote(s): 20 supporting and 5 opposing.
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 5 supporting and 14 opposing with 1 absence/present vote(s).
High confidence based on 19 mapped decisive vote(s): 17 supporting and 2 opposing.
High confidence based on 18 mapped decisive vote(s): 14 supporting and 4 opposing.
Rep. Owens voted with his party 99.4% of the time across 326 recorded votes, with a 59% attendance rate and 227 missed votes. On top-tier issues, he opposed immigration (24 of 30 mapped votes against), gun control (6 of 9 against), abortion rights (6 of 9 against), and LGBTQ+ rights (7 of 9 against). He supported tax policy, healthcare affordability, public education funding, defense spending, and infrastructure investment. On climate and environmental protection, mapped votes show more opposition than support, though his stated stance is neutral. He voted present or absent on several votes related to workers' rights, government spending, and voting rights.
Opposed immigration (24 of 30 votes), gun control (6 of 9), abortion rights (6 of 9), LGBTQ+ rights (7 of 9)
Supported tax policy, healthcare affordability, defense spending, and infrastructure investment
Mixed or opposing record on climate change, environmental protection, and renewable energy despite pro-stances
99.4% party-line voting; 59% attendance with 227 missed votes
Signature issues
Synthesized from public voting and stance records only; not motive, corruption, electoral prospects, or district-wide opinion.
38 mapped issues • Updated May 28, 2026 • 32 non-gated high-confidence issues · 2 moderate-confidence issues · 4 limited-evidence issues · 1 evidence-gated issue · Model claude-haiku-4-5-20251001
Sources: Congress.gov · FEC · public disclosures. Methodology and citations on this district record.